Pages Menu

Sunday, October 5, 2025

Testing the Gospel Ethic in Israel and Palestine

Vintage poster of Jesus with a dove and overlapping Israeli and Palestinian flags, captioned Love Thy Neighbour.



Where the Jesus ethic meets the daily reality of Israel and Palestine

By J. André Faust (Oct 04, 2025)

The Motif

The figure of Jesus is a moral North Star: peace, mercy, forgiveness, love of enemy, care for the vulnerable. The Sermon on the Mount, the call to peacemakers, the command to love those who hate you, and the preference for humility over status set a clear ethic. It is an ethic of means, not only ends, and it measures success by the dignity preserved in those who suffer.

Where the Contradiction Appears

Modern states operate inside a hard world of borders, deterrence, and survival. Leaders are rewarded for security outcomes, not for moral beauty. The result is a visible gap between the motif and the methods often used in its name. This gap is not new. It is a repeating pattern: an ideal rises, power consolidates around it, power drifts toward self-preservation, then renewal is needed to realign means with the original purpose.

The Dialectic: How Ideals Drift

  1. Ideal: a unifying moral vision invites sacrifice and trust.
  2. Power: institutions stabilize the vision and guard the community.
  3. Corruption: incentives tilt toward control, secrecy, and punishment.
  4. Renewal: voices of conscience expose the drift and call the system back.

Mechanics of the Contradiction

  • Security dilemma: one side’s “defense” looks like “aggression” to the other, so each escalation invites the next.
  • Trauma memory: communities with deep wounds overweight worst-case risks and accept harsher measures as “insurance.”
  • Bureaucratic survival: agencies protect budgets, reputations, and doctrines, even when conditions change.
  • Signaling politics: leaders prove strength to domestic audiences, which narrows room for de-escalation.
  • Moral licensing: doing some good becomes a pass for doing harm “for the greater good.”
  • Media incentives: outrage and spectacle reward maximal responses and punish restraint.
  • Path dependence: once you invest in a tool, you keep using it, even when it is no longer the right tool.
Historical Dialectic of Ideals and Power

Practical Tests: Are We Close to the Motif?

  • Means vs ends: are the means humane, or only the goal?
  • Enemy image: do we leave space for the opponent’s repentance, or only for their defeat?
  • Proportionality: are responses limited, precise, and revisable?
  • Protection of the vulnerable: are noncombatants, prisoners, and the poor actively shielded?
  • Transparency: can citizens audit the policy, the data, and the costs?
  • Burden sharing: do decision makers share the costs, or export them downward?
  • Room for dissent: are critics treated as partners in truth-seeking, or as enemies?

What Renewal Looks Like

Renewal begins when conscience regains jurisdiction over strategy. In practice that means verifiable de-escalation steps, humanitarian corridors with third-party monitors, time-limited emergency powers, protection of journalists and medics, restorative elements for the innocent, and language that recognizes the other’s dignity. None of this guarantees safety, yet each step closes the gap between the motif and the method.

Why This Matters

The point is not to romanticize power or to shame those who exercise it. The point is to keep power answerable to the very ideal that gave it birth. Every era repeats the same spiral. The question is whether we notice the drift early enough to correct it without catastrophe.


References (APA 7)

  1. Allison, G. T., & Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis (2nd ed.). Longman.
  2. Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Charles Scribner’s Sons. (Original work published 1923)
  3. Cohen, S. J. D. (1999). The beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, varieties, uncertainties. University of California Press.
  4. Goodman, M. (2007). Rome and Jerusalem: The clash of ancient civilizations. Penguin.
  5. Heschel, A. J. (1955). God in search of man: A philosophy of Judaism. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  6. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon.
  7. Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214.
  8. Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357.
  9. Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48–49.
  10. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
  11. Schäfer, P. (Ed.). (2003). The Bar Kokhba War reconsidered: New perspectives on the second Jewish revolt against Rome. Mohr Siebeck.
  12. Schelling, T. C. (1966). Arms and influence. Yale University Press.
  13. Smallwood, E. M. (1976). The Jews under Roman rule: From Pompey to Diocletian. Brill.
  14. The Holy Bible, New Revised Standard Version. (1989). National Council of Churches. (Citations used: Matthew 5:9; Luke 6:27; Matthew 5:39; John 18:36)
  15. Yoder, J. H. (1994). The politics of Jesus (2nd ed.). Eerdmans.
  16. Sacks, J. (2002). The dignity of difference: How to avoid the clash of civilizations. Continuum.

No comments:

Post a Comment