Game Theory: An Analytical Perspective
I have changed the format of my posts from critiques to analyses of the world issues that face us. My analogy is that “life is like a chessboard” where we are all players trying to maximize our outcomes. These outcomes can be financial, spiritual, or anything else that gives us a sense of accomplishment.
One of the best tools I use to analyze these issues is Game Theory, initially conceptualized by John von Neumann. Later, John Nash developed the concept known as the Nash Equilibrium, which significantly expanded the scope of Game Theory. While von Neumann’s minimax theorem focused on two-player zero-sum games, Nash Equilibrium extended Game Theory to include non-zero-sum games and multi-player interactions. This advancement made the theory applicable to real-world scenarios where cooperation and competition coexist—such as in political science, psychology, biology, business, and computer science.
What is Game Theory?
Game Theory can best be explained as the study of strategic interactions among rational players, often under conditions of uncertainty, with the aim of maximizing their payoffs. This aligns with the core belief that “there are no absolutes, only probabilities that reside on a spectrum ranging from highly unlikely to very likely.”
Game Theory becomes a way of thinking that is not always intuitive. It is highly abstract, yet it is constantly evolving as new applications and insights emerge.
Below, I have included a glossary of game theory-specific terms to demonstrate that Game Theory goes far beyond the level of simple board games.
A
Adverse Selection: A situation where one party has more information than another, often leading to inefficient outcomes (e.g., in insurance markets).
Agent: A decision-maker in a game, often representing individuals, groups, or organizations.
Asymmetric Game: A game where players have different strategies, payoffs, or information available to them.
Auction: A game where participants bid for an item, and the highest bidder wins, with variations like English, Dutch, or sealed-bid auctions.
B
Backward Induction: Solving a sequential game by reasoning backward from the end of the game to determine optimal strategies.
Bayesian Game: A game where players have incomplete information but hold beliefs about unknown factors, represented as probabilities.
Best Response: A strategy that maximizes a player’s payoff given the strategies of other players.
Bounded Rationality: The idea that players have limitations in their ability to process information or make perfectly rational decisions.
C
Chance Node: A point in a game tree where an outcome is determined by chance, rather than a player's decision.
Chicken Game: A game where players face off to avoid mutual destruction, often illustrating the concept of brinkmanship.
Coalition: A group of players who collaborate to achieve a better outcome than they could individually.
Cooperative Game: A game where players can form binding agreements or coalitions to achieve mutual benefits.
Correlated Equilibrium: A solution concept where players coordinate their strategies based on a shared random signal.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of a strategy or decision.
D
Decision Node: A point in a game tree where a player chooses a strategy.
Discount Factor: A measure of how much future payoffs are valued compared to immediate ones in repeated or dynamic games.
Dominant Strategy: A strategy that yields a higher payoff for a player regardless of what others do.
Dominated Strategy: A strategy that always results in a worse payoff than another strategy, regardless of opponents’ actions.
E
Equilibrium: A state where no player can improve their payoff by unilaterally changing their strategy.
Evolutionary Game Theory: A framework that applies game theory to evolving populations, focusing on strategies that persist over time.
Expected Utility: The weighted average of all possible payoffs, where the weights are the probabilities of each outcome.
F
Focal Point: A solution or strategy that players naturally gravitate toward, often due to cultural or contextual clues.
Free Rider Problem: A situation in cooperative scenarios where individuals benefit from shared resources without contributing to their cost.
G
Game of Perfect Information: A game where all players know the entire history of moves and decisions made so far.
Game Theory: The study of strategic interactions where players make decisions to maximize their payoffs.
H
Hawk-Dove Game: A model of conflict where players can either compete (Hawk) or share (Dove), balancing aggression and cooperation.
Heuristic: A rule-of-thumb or simplified strategy used by players to make decisions when full rationality is impractical.
I
Imperfect Information: A game where players do not have full knowledge of all actions taken by others.
Information Set: The collection of decisions or events known to a player at a particular point in a game.
Iterated Game: A game played repeatedly by the same players, often with strategies evolving over time.
K
Knowledge Assumptions: The shared understanding among players about the game’s rules, structure, and other players’ rationality.
L
Learning in Games: The process where players adjust their strategies over time based on past outcomes or observations.
Loss Aversion: The tendency for players to prefer avoiding losses over acquiring equivalent gains.
M
Mechanism Design: The creation of rules or systems (a “game”) to achieve specific outcomes, often in economics or auctions.
Minimax Strategy: A strategy that minimizes the maximum possible loss for a player.
Mixed Strategy: A strategy where a player randomly chooses between multiple actions, assigning probabilities to each.
Moral Hazard: A situation where one player takes risks because another player bears the consequences.
N
Nash Equilibrium: A situation where no player can improve their payoff by unilaterally changing their strategy.
Non-Cooperative Game: A game where players make decisions independently without binding agreements.
Non-Zero-Sum Game: A game where the total payoff can vary, and players’ outcomes are not strictly opposed.
O
Opportunity Cost: The value of the next best alternative that is forgone when making a decision.
Outcome: The result of all players’ strategies in a game.
P
Pareto Efficiency: A state where no player can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
Payoff: The reward or outcome a player receives from a particular strategy or decision.
Payoff Matrix: A table that shows the payoffs for each player based on all possible strategy combinations.
Prisoner's Dilemma: A classic game showing how two rational players might not cooperate, even when it benefits both.
Q
Quantal Response Equilibrium: A solution concept where players choose strategies with probabilities that increase with the expected payoff.
R
Rationality: The assumption that players will act in their best interest to maximize their payoffs.
Repeated Game: A game that is played multiple times, allowing players to develop strategies over time.
Risk Dominance: A strategy that is safer or less risky when there is uncertainty about other players' choices.
S
Shapley Value: A solution concept in cooperative games that fairly distributes payoffs based on each player’s contribution.
Stackelberg Competition: A model of market competition where one firm (leader) moves first, and the other firms (followers) respond.
Strategy: A plan of action a player follows in a game to achieve the best possible outcome.
Subgame Perfect Equilibrium: A refinement of Nash Equilibrium applicable to games with a sequential structure.
T
Tit-for-Tat: A strategy in repeated games where a player replicates the opponent’s last move, often used in cooperation scenarios.
Transferable Utility: A property of some cooperative games where payoffs can be redistributed among players without loss.
U
Ultimatum Game: A game where one player proposes a division of resources, and the other player accepts or rejects it.
Utility: A measure of satisfaction or payoff a player receives from a particular outcome.
V
Value of Information: The benefit a player gains from acquiring additional information before making a decision.
Von Neumann-Morgenstern Utility: A utility function that satisfies the axioms of expected utility theory.
W
Weak Dominance: A strategy that performs at least as well as another strategy in all scenarios and better in at least one scenario.
Winner’s Curse: The tendency for the winning bidder in an auction to overpay due to incomplete information.
Z
Zero-Sum Game: A game where one player’s gain is exactly balanced by the losses of other players, making the total payoff constant.
.
